Early Madras: Prehistory to the Advent of Europeans

The name Madras has a long and complex history. Several explanations have been suggested regarding its origin, although no single theory has been universally accepted. One explanation associates the name with Madraspatnam, a coastal settlement that existed during the early period of European trading activities. Another explanation connects it with the name of a local fishing settlement. The name Chennapatnam is generally associated with the settlement that developed around Fort St. George during the seventeenth century. In 1639, the English East India Company acquired land on the Coromandel Coast and Fort St. George was established in 1640.

The surrounding settlements gradually developed into an important commercial and administrative centre under British rule. During the colonial period, Madras became the headquarters of the Madras Presidency. In 1996, the Government of Tamil Nadu officially changed the city’s name from Madras to Chennai. In prehistoric archaeology, however, the term Madrasian continues to be used to identify the distinctive Lower Palaeolithic stone-tool industry discovered in and around the old Madras region.

The archaeological term Madrasian is therefore geographical in origin. It does not refer to the colonial city itself, but to the prehistoric stone-tool tradition identified in the surrounding landscape.

The Madras region is situated in the northeastern part of Tamil Nadu, along the Coromandel Coast of the Bay of Bengal. The prehistoric sites associated with the Madras Handaxe Industry are distributed mainly around Chennai and the neighbouring Tiruvallur and Chengalpattu regions. The geographical environment played an important role in the development of prehistoric settlements. The region contains river valleys, lateritic formations, gravel deposits, rocky surfaces and natural sources of quartzite. These conditions provided early humans with materials for manufacturing stone tools and access to water and other natural resources.

The Kortallaiyar River Basin

One of the most important geographical areas associated with the Madrasian Culture is the Kortallaiyar, also known as the Kosasthalaiyar, river basin. The basin extends across the northern part of the Chennai region and contains several important Palaeolithic sites. Its landscape includes river terraces, sedimentary deposits, gravel beds and exposed geological formations. The prehistoric inhabitants of this region used quartzite and other available stones to manufacture tools. The presence of suitable raw materials, together with riverine resources, made this landscape significant for early human occupation.

Important Prehistoric Sites

Pallavaram: Located southwest of Chennai, Pallavaram is historically significant because Robert Bruce Foote discovered a Palaeolithic handaxe here on 30 May 1863. The discovery was made in a lateritic gravel deposit and became a landmark in Indian archaeology.

Government Museum Chennai

Other sites: The wider prehistoric landscape of northern Tamil Nadu includes several localities associated with the Kortallaiyar basin, where archaeological investigations have revealed evidence of early stone-tool production and human occupation. These sites demonstrate that prehistoric activity was not restricted to a single settlement. Instead, early humans occupied and utilised a wider geographical landscape containing rivers, raw materials and other resources.

Origin and Discovery

The Madras Handaxe Industry represents an important prehistoric stone-tool tradition belonging to the Lower Palaeolithic period. It is associated with the Acheulian technological tradition, which is recognised by the production of large cutting tools, particularly handaxes and cleavers. The term Madrasian was derived from Madras, where some of the earliest recognised Palaeolithic tools in India were discovered.

The discovery of a handaxe by Robert Bruce Foote at Pallavaram in 1863 provided the foundation for identifying this prehistoric industry. Subsequent discoveries at Attirampakkam and other locations established the existence of an extensive stone-tool tradition in the region.

Characteristics of the Madras Handaxe Industry

The most distinctive feature of the Madrasian Culture was the manufacture of large stone tools using hard rocks, particularly quartzite. Prehistoric inhabitants selected suitable stone blocks, pebbles and flakes and shaped them through repeated blows. This process is known as stone knapping. Tools were manufactured by removing flakes from a stone core to produce the required shape and cutting edge. Some implements were worked on both surfaces, a technique known as bifacial flaking. The principal tools associated with this industry were handaxes, cleavers, choppers and various flake tools. Handaxes were the most characteristic implements. They were generally oval, pear-shaped or pointed, with cutting edges produced through bifacial flaking. These tools could have been used for cutting, chopping and processing animal or plant materials.

Cleavers were another important category of tools. Unlike pointed handaxes, cleavers possessed a broad cutting edge at one end. They were suitable for heavy cutting and chopping activities. Choppers were relatively simple tools manufactured by removing flakes from a stone pebble or core to create a sharp working edge. Flake tools were produced from pieces detached during the manufacturing process. Some flakes were further modified to create useful cutting or scraping edges. The presence of these different tools indicates that early humans possessed considerable knowledge of raw materials and stone-working techniques.

Chronology of the Industry

Modern archaeological investigations have greatly improved our understanding of the antiquity of this culture. Excavations at Attirampakkam have established that Acheulian occupation in the region extends back to approximately 1.5 million years ago. Later investigations also revealed a transition from Acheulian technology to Middle Palaeolithic technology around 385,000 years ago, with the latter continuing at the site until approximately 172,000 years ago. These findings demonstrate the long history of prehistoric occupation in the region and the gradual development of stone-tool technology.

Archaeological Importance

The Madras Handaxe Industry occupies a significant position in Indian prehistory because it provided early evidence of Lower Palaeolithic human activity in the subcontinent. Its discovery established that early humans had occupied southern India during the Pleistocene period. The tools also enabled archaeologists to compare Indian prehistoric technology with Acheulian traditions found in Africa, Europe and other parts of Asia.

Although the term Madrasian remains historically important, modern archaeological studies generally discuss this material within the wider Acheulian technological tradition.

Early Life and Career

Robert Bruce Foote (1834–1912) was a British geologist and archaeologist who made pioneering contributions to the study of Indian prehistory. He joined the Geological Survey of India in 1858 and undertook extensive geological investigations in different parts of the country. During his geological surveys, Foote developed a strong interest in the prehistoric past. His knowledge of geological formations enabled him to recognise the relationship between stone implements, sedimentary deposits and the antiquity of human occupation.

At a time when the scientific study of Indian prehistory was still in its early stages, Foote began systematically searching for evidence of prehistoric human activity. His discoveries eventually earned him the title Father of Indian Prehistory.

Discovery at Pallavaram, 1863

The most important event in Foote’s archaeological career occurred on 30 May 1863. While conducting geological investigations at Pallavaram, near Madras, he discovered a chipped stone handaxe in a lateritic gravel deposit. Foote recognised that the object was not an ordinary stone but a deliberately manufactured implement belonging to an early period of human history. This discovery provided the first widely recognised evidence of a Palaeolithic stone tool in India. It established the existence of prehistoric human activity in southern India and opened a new field of archaeological investigation. The discovery was particularly significant because it connected Indian prehistoric research with contemporary archaeological developments in Europe, where the antiquity of human-made stone tools was being scientifically established.

Discovery at Attirampakkam

Following the Pallavaram discovery, Foote continued his investigations in the surrounding region. On 28 September 1863, Foote and his colleague William King discovered a Palaeolithic cleaver in a stream bed at Attirampakkam. This discovery strengthened the evidence for the existence of an extensive prehistoric stone-tool industry in the Madras region.

Attirampakkam subsequently became one of the most important archaeological sites for studying the Acheulian tradition in South Asia. Foote also examined the geological deposits and distribution of stone tools, recognising that archaeological objects needed to be studied in relation to their environmental and geological contexts.

Contributions to Indian Archaeology

Foote’s contribution was not limited to the discovery of individual stone implements. He undertook extensive explorations across southern and western India, identifying numerous prehistoric sites and collecting archaeological materials. His investigations included Palaeolithic and Neolithic stone tools, as well as other prehistoric and protohistoric antiquities. He carefully documented the location, geological context and characteristics of the objects he discovered. His work helped establish the importance of systematic field investigation in Indian archaeology.

Foote’s research demonstrated that the prehistoric past of India could be reconstructed through material evidence, even in the absence of written records. He also contributed to the classification of prehistoric tools and the recognition of different stages of technological development. His collection and published studies became important resources for subsequent generations of archaeologists.

The Foote Collection

One of Foote’s lasting contributions was the preservation of his extensive collection of prehistoric and protohistoric antiquities. The Madras Government Museum acquired his collection in 1904–1905. It included stone implements and other archaeological materials collected during his long career. Collection became an important resource for studying the prehistoric cultures of India. Work was subsequently documented in publications including The Foote Collection of Indian Prehistoric and Protohistoric Antiquities: Notes on Their Ages and Distribution, published in 1916. Today, the Government Museum in Chennai preserves important materials associated with Foote’s discoveries and the early development of prehistoric archaeology in India.

The discoveries of Robert Bruce Foote encouraged subsequent generations of archaeologists to investigate the prehistoric landscape of the Madras region. The work of V. D. Krishnaswami and other researchers contributed to the classification and understanding of the stone-tool industries of southern India. Modern archaeological investigations have further developed this research through systematic excavation, geological analysis and scientific dating.

Particularly important are the investigations undertaken at Attirampakkam by Shanti Pappu, Kumar Akhilesh and their research collaborators. Their excavations have produced valuable evidence concerning the antiquity of Acheulian occupation, the development of stone-tool technology and changes in prehistoric environments. These investigations have transformed Attirampakkam from a historically important discovery site into a major centre for understanding early human technological development in South Asia.

The prehistoric history of Madras occupies an important position in the archaeological heritage of India. The region’s geographical setting, particularly the Kortallaiyar river basin, provided a favourable environment for early human occupation and the manufacture of stone tools. The Madras Handaxe Industry represents an important Lower Palaeolithic technological tradition characterised by the production of handaxes, cleavers and other stone implements. These tools provide evidence of early human adaptation, technological knowledge and interaction with the natural environment.

The discoveries made by Robert Bruce Foote at Pallavaram and Attirampakkam in 1863 marked the beginning of systematic prehistoric archaeological research in India. His careful documentation, extensive explorations and preservation of archaeological materials laid the foundation for subsequent investigations. Modern research at Attirampakkam has further demonstrated the great antiquity of human occupation in southern India. Thus, the history of the Madras Handaxe Industry is not merely the story of a particular stone-tool tradition. It is also the story of how the discovery of a single handaxe transformed the understanding of India’s prehistoric past.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25444

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29388951/

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/madrasien-on-the-trail-of-a-terminology-in-indian-prehistory/D765FCB0C537663128404E9E6746C4D7

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364941346_The_’Madrasien’_on_the_trail_of_a_terminology_in_Indian_prehistory

https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.22436

https://archive.org/details/dli.chennai.142

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21436450/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50850835_Early_Pleistocene_Presence_of_Acheulian_Hominins_in_South_India

Chennai lies on the Coromandel Coast, bordered by the Bay of Bengal. The region is associated with the rivers Cooum and Adyar, which supported settlement and agriculture.

Its coastal position made the region suitable for:

• Maritime trade
• Fishing and salt production
• Agriculture
• Religious and cultural exchange
• Communication with other parts of South India and overseas regions

The geographical location of Chennai therefore contributed greatly to its development as an important settlement and later as a major port city.

The history of Chennai should not be equated only with the foundation of Madras by the English East India Company.

The modern city developed by incorporating several older settlements and villages such as:

• Mylapore
• Triplicane (Tiruvallikeni)
• Thiruvanmiyur
• Adyar
• Egmore
• Purasawalkam
• Mambalam
• Tondiarpet

Several of these places have independent historical and religious traditions.

Among them, Mylapore has especially important literary and religious associations. The ancient settlement was connected with maritime activity and later became an important centre of Saiva and Vaishnava traditions.

The Pallavas were one of the most important powers of northern Tamil Nadu between approximately the 4th and 9th centuries CE. Their major political centre was Kanchipuram, which was located relatively close to the Chennai region.

Pallava Influence

The Chennai region came within the wider political and cultural sphere of the Pallavas. Pallava rule contributed to:

• Temple construction
• Development of Sanskrit and Tamil learning
• Growth of Saivism and Vaishnavism
• Expansion of agriculture
• Development of settlements
• Maritime contacts

The nearby Mamallapuram (Mahabalipuram) became a major Pallava centre under rulers such as Narasimhavarman I.

Mylapore and the Pallava Age

Mylapore is particularly significant in discussions of the antiquity of Chennai. Literary and religious traditions associate Mylapore with ancient Saiva worship.

The Kapaleeshwarar temple tradition connects the locality with an ancient sacred landscape. The present temple structure, however, should not simply be assumed to be identical to an ancient Pallava-period structure; the history of the temple involves later rebuilding and changes.

Thus, Mylapore represents an important example of how sacred traditions, literary references and later architectural evidence contribute to reconstructing Chennai’s past.

One of the most important literary sources for the ancient history of the Chennai region is Tamil devotional literature.

Tevaram

The Tevaram hymns of the Nayanmar saints, particularly Tirugnana Sambandar, contain references to sacred places in the Tamil region.

Mylapore is traditionally identified with the Mayilai mentioned in Saiva devotional traditions.

These references are valuable because they demonstrate that Mylapore was remembered as an important religious settlement during the early medieval period.

Periyapuranam

The Periyapuranam, written by Sekkizhar in the 12th century, provides important information about Saiva sacred traditions.

The story of Poompavai is closely associated with Mylapore and Tirugnana Sambandar. Though the narrative is primarily religious and hagiographical, it provides evidence for the importance of Mylapore in the medieval Saiva imagination.

After the Pallavas, the Cholas emerged as a dominant power in Tamil Nadu.

From approximately the 9th to the 13th centuries CE, Chola political influence extended across large parts of South India.

The Chennai region formed part of the wider Chola administrative and cultural landscape.

Chola Contributions

The Cholas promoted:

• Irrigation and agriculture
• Temple institutions
• Village administration
• Land grants
• Trade and commerce
• Saiva and Vaishnava religious institutions
• Tamil literary culture

The inscriptions of the Chola period are particularly important because they provide concrete information regarding land, taxation, administration, donations and temple activities.

During the Chola period, temples became important institutions in the economic and social life of Tamil settlements.

Temples served not merely as places of worship but also as:

• Centres of economic activity
• Landholding institutions
• Places of education
• Centres of cultural activity
• Employers of artisans and service groups
• Repositories of inscriptions and records

Settlements in and around present-day Chennai developed within this broader temple-centred rural and urban network.

Chola-period Tamil literature and inscriptions help reconstruct the social and cultural history of the region.

Works associated with the Bhakti tradition provide information about sacred geography, religious communities and important settlements.

The combination of:

Literature + inscriptions + temple traditions + archaeology

allows historians to reconstruct the historical development of Chennai more effectively.

However, literary sources must be critically examined because religious literature often combines historical memory with mythology and devotional elements.

After the decline of the Cholas and other regional powers, northern Tamil Nadu passed through several political changes.

From the 14th century onwards, the Vijayanagar Empire became a major political power in South India.

The Chennai region came under the influence of the Vijayanagar rulers, particularly through their administration of the Tamil country.

Vijayanagar Administration

The Vijayanagar rulers strengthened:

• Temple institutions
• Agricultural settlements
• Revenue administration
• Trade networks
• Military organisation
• Urban and commercial centres

The Nayakas, who exercised authority under Vijayanagar, also played an important role in the development of settlements in the Tamil region.

Tiruvallikeni (Triplicane) is another ancient settlement within present-day Chennai. It is particularly famous for the Parthasarathy Temple, dedicated to Lord Krishna as Parthasarathy.

The temple has a long Vaishnava tradition and is associated with the Alvar devotional movement.

The presence of the temple demonstrates the continuity of religious settlements in the Chennai region from the early medieval period through later centuries.

Literary sources are among the most important means of understanding Chennai’s antiquity.

Sangam and Early Tamil Literature

Some scholars have attempted to connect ancient coastal settlements mentioned in Tamil literature with locations around modern Chennai. Such identifications must, however, be made cautiously because ancient geographical names cannot always be equated directly with modern place names.

Bhakti Literature

The works of:

• Nayanmars
• Alvars
• Sekkizhar

provide important references to sacred settlements such as Mylapore and Tiruvallikeni.

European Accounts

From the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, European travellers and merchants began providing descriptions of the Coromandel Coast.

These accounts become increasingly valuable for understanding the transition from the medieval settlements to the emergence of Madras under European influence.

Inscriptions provide more direct evidence than many literary traditions.

Inscriptions found in and around Chennai and neighbouring regions can reveal:

• Names of rulers
• Land donations
• Taxation
• Temple administration
• Village assemblies
• Religious endowments
• Names of local officials
• Economic activities

Pallava, Chola and later inscriptions therefore help establish the existence and development of settlements in the region.

Oral traditions form another important source for studying the historical antiquity of Chennai.

Oral traditions are stories, memories and customs transmitted from one generation to another.

Important examples include traditions associated with:

• Mylapore
• Tiruvallikeni
• Thiruvanmiyur
• Egmore
• Adyar
• Local temples
• Fishing communities
• Village deities
• Traditional occupations

Importance of Oral Traditions

Oral traditions help historians understand:

• Local memories
• Community identities
• Sacred landscapes
• Traditional occupations
• Migration histories
• Changes in neighbourhoods
• Relationships between people and places

For example, stories surrounding Mylapore Kapaleeshwarar Temple and Triplicane Parthasarathy Temple have been transmitted through generations and remain important components of Chennai’s cultural identity.

Oral traditions cannot always be accepted as literal historical facts.

They may contain:

• Mythological elements
• Religious beliefs
• Legendary figures
• Later additions
• Collective memories

Therefore, historians compare oral traditions with:

Inscriptions + archaeology + literature + architecture + archival records

This method helps distinguish between historical evidence and cultural memory.

Archaeology provides another important dimension to Chennai’s antiquity.

Archaeological investigations in Chennai and its surrounding areas have revealed evidence relating to ancient settlement, trade and material culture.

Important archaeological indicators include:

• Pottery
• Coins
• Inscriptions
• Beads
• Structural remains
• Burial-related evidence in the wider region
• Artefacts connected with trade

The wider Chennai–Kanchipuram–Mamallapuram region formed an important cultural and commercial zone during ancient and medieval times.

The location of Chennai on the Coromandel Coast gave it access to maritime networks.

Mylapore in particular is traditionally regarded as an ancient coastal trading settlement.

Maritime activity connected the Tamil coast with:

• Sri Lanka
• Southeast Asia
• Other parts of the Indian subcontinent
• Western Indian Ocean trading networks

The coastal location therefore contributed to the region’s long-term economic importance.

The establishment of the English settlement in 1639 did not create Chennai’s history from nothing.

Rather, the English settlement developed in a landscape that already contained:

• Ancient villages
• Temples
• Agricultural settlements
• Trading communities
• Fishing communities
• Local political institutions
• Long-established cultural traditions

The growth of Fort St. George and Madras gradually transformed these older settlements into a large colonial urban centre.

These periods demonstrate that Chennai developed through continuous layers of political, economic and cultural change.

The historical antiquity of Chennai extends well beyond the seventeenth-century establishment of Madras. The region’s past can be reconstructed through the combined study of archaeology, inscriptions, temples, literary works and oral traditions.

The Pallavas contributed to the religious and cultural development of the region; the Cholas strengthened temple-centred administration, agriculture and economic institutions; and the Vijayanagar rulers and their Nayakas continued and transformed these political and religious networks.

Places such as Mylapore, Tiruvallikeni and Thiruvanmiyur preserve important memories of Chennai’s medieval past. Literary works such as Tevaram and Periyapuranam, together with inscriptions and oral traditions, reveal the cultural significance of these settlements.

Thus, Chennai should be understood not merely as a colonial city founded around Fort St. George, but as a historic urban region built upon several centuries of settlement, religious activity, commerce and cultural continuity.

• S. Krishnaswami Aiyangar – South India and Her Muhammadan Invaders
• K. A. Nilakanta Sastri – The Cholas
• K. A. Nilakanta Sastri – A History of South India
• T. V. Mahalingam – South Indian Polity
• Burton Stein – Peasant State and Society in Medieval South India
• S. R. Balasubrahmanyam – works on Chola temple architecture
• South Indian Inscriptions, Archaeological Survey of India
• The Madras District Gazetteers – historical information on the Madras region.

The geographical position of the Coromandel Coast was one of the main reasons for its importance in early modern trade. The eastern coast of South India was connected by sea with ports in Southeast Asia and by land with the interior regions of the Tamil and Telugu country. The coast was also well known for cotton textiles. European trading companies wanted access to these products because they could be exchanged or sold in other markets. The English East India Company, established in 1600, gradually expanded its commercial activities in India. Its early activities were not limited to the Madras region; it also established trading centres on the western and eastern coasts. However, the Company needed secure places where it could maintain warehouses, employ agents and negotiate with local authorities (Greater Chennai Corporation). Before the English established themselves at Madras, other European powers had already entered the Coromandel region. The Dutch had a strong presence at Pulicat, while the Portuguese had established themselves at São Tomé near Mylapore. These settlements demonstrate that the English arrival was part of a wider competition among European commercial powers. European companies did not simply take possession of empty land. They negotiated with rulers, paid for rights, competed with one another and depended on local merchants and producers. This is an important point because older descriptions of colonial history sometimes give the impression that Europeans acted independently of Indian society. In reality, their commercial success depended to a great extent on cooperation and negotiation with local groups.

The English experience on the Coromandel Coast also explains why Madras became attractive. The English had attempted to establish themselves at Pulicat, but the Dutch were already influential there. They also tried places such as Peddapalli or Nizampatnam and later Armagaon. These experiments were not entirely successful. The Company therefore searched for a new location where it could obtain textiles at favourable prices and operate with greater freedom. The Greater Chennai Corporation’s historical account notes that Francis Day explored the coast in 1637 and found the textile production at Madraspatnam promising. The availability of cheaper calico cloth was one of the practical reasons for the Company’s interest in the site. The political situation was equally important. The region was nominally under the authority of the rulers of Chandragiri, successors to the Vijayanagara political order, while local Nayaks exercised authority in particular areas. Damarla Venkatapathy Nayak controlled territory along the coast, and his brother Ayyappa Nayak was based at Poonamallee. The English therefore needed the agreement of local political authorities before they could establish a permanent settlement. The foundation of Madras was consequently based on both commercial calculation and political negotiation. This combination remained important throughout the later history of the city. Thus, the first stage in the advent of Europeans was not the immediate creation of a British city. It was the development of a competitive coastal trading environment in which Portuguese, Dutch and English interests met Indian rulers, merchants and producers. Madras emerged from this larger regional context. The English settlement became successful because it connected the Company’s overseas trade with the established textile economy and political networks of the Coromandel Coast.

The Portuguese were among the earliest European groups to establish a lasting presence in the Madras region. Their settlement at São Tomé de Meliapor, commonly called San Thome, was located close to the older town of Mylapore. Mylapore had a history that was much older than European involvement. It had links with maritime trade and religious traditions, and its location on the coast made it useful for communication and commerce. The Portuguese presence added a new European element to this older urban and commercial environment. Therefore, when the English later established themselves at Madraspatnam, they were entering a region where European merchants and religious communities were already present. São Tomé was important to the Portuguese for both commercial and religious reasons. Portuguese merchants used the settlement as part of their wider network in the Indian Ocean, while Catholic religious institutions also developed there. The town became associated with the tradition concerning St Thomas and with the Portuguese religious presence in the region. The existence of this settlement meant that European residents, merchants and religious personnel were already familiar with local trade and with the political conditions of the Coromandel Coast. Later European activity therefore took place alongside, and sometimes in competition with, an older Portuguese presence. The relationship between São Tomé and Madras is important because the two settlements were close to each other but had different political and commercial histories. The English settlement was centred on the new fortified factory at Fort St George, whereas São Tomé had grown from the Portuguese settlement associated with Mylapore. The two communities nevertheless interacted. Indian merchants could deal with both European groups, and people who had experience with the Portuguese could become useful to the English. The Greater Chennai Corporation’s history mentions Raghava Battan, who had lived in the Portuguese settlement of San Thome and later assisted the English in obtaining the Madras site. This example shows how local people could move between European commercial environments.

The Portuguese presence also reminds us that the history of European expansion was not a simple story of one European power replacing another. The Portuguese, Dutch, English and later French competed for influence, while Indian rulers retained political authority in different parts of the region. European settlements depended on local supplies, labour, merchants and political permissions. The English success at Madras eventually became much greater than the Portuguese position at San Thome, but the Portuguese settlement remained an important part of the early history of the Chennai region. In academic study, it is therefore useful to place San Thome before the foundation of Fort St George in the chronological narrative. It establishes that the coast already had European connections before 1639. It also helps explain why the early history of Madras contains Portuguese influences in addition to English ones. The later political expansion of the English should not hide the earlier history of Mylapore and São Tomé or the continuing participation of Indian communities in the development of the region.

The English East India Company was formed in 1600 to participate in the profitable trade of the Indian Ocean and the wider Asian region. In India, the Company established factories or trading houses at different ports. A factory in this period did not mean a modern industrial building. It was mainly a commercial establishment containing warehouses, offices, residences and facilities for Company servants. The Company wanted such places to be safe enough for trade and, where possible, protected by agreements with local rulers. On the Coromandel Coast the English faced strong competition. Pulicat was already dominated by the Dutch, who had developed a fortified settlement there. Masulipatnam was an important port, but the English found their position there less satisfactory than they wanted. Armagaon also did not provide a permanent solution. These experiences encouraged Company officials to search for a more suitable location. The decision was not based on one factor alone. They considered the availability of textiles, the political attitude of local authorities, access to the sea and the general prospects for long-term trade.

Francis Day played a central role in this search. He was associated with the Company’s Masulipatnam Council and was Chief of the Armagaon Factory. In 1637 he travelled along the coast, examining possible sites. When he reached the area of Madraspatnam, he found that the local cotton cloth was available at prices that appeared favourable to the Company. His report helped to convince the English that the site could support a new factory (Greater Chennai Corporation). The English were also encouraged by the local political authorities. Damarla Venkatapathy Nayak ruled a substantial coastal territory, while his brother Ayyappa Nayak was involved in the administration of the area around Poonamallee. The Nayaks had reasons to encourage European trade. A new trading settlement could bring commercial activity and potentially increase the political and economic importance of the territory. The English, for their part, needed legal permission to occupy the site and build permanent structures. This mutual interest created the conditions for negotiation. The choice of Madraspatnam was therefore the result of a practical decision by the Company rather than an accidental event. The site offered access to textile production and was located within a political territory whose local authorities were willing to grant the English rights to settle. The later importance of Madras sometimes makes the original decision appear inevitable, but it was not. At the time, the English were choosing among several possible sites on a competitive coast. The success of the settlement was shaped by later developments as much as by the original choice.

The land grant of 1639 provided the political and territorial foundation for the English settlement at Madras. Francis Day obtained a grant from Damarla Venkatapathy Nayak that allowed the English to establish themselves at Madraspatnam. The Greater Chennai Corporation records the grant as being dated August 1639 and states that it gave the English the village of Madraspatnam for a specified period and permitted them to build a fort and settlement. The grant was later confirmed within the political structure of the Chandragiri rulers. The significance of the grant lies in the fact that it provided a political and legal basis for the Company’s presence. European merchants could not simply establish a permanent settlement without local permission. A written grant made the Company’s rights more secure and provided an official foundation for constructing buildings and conducting trade. This is why the land grant is often described as the foundation of English Madras. It connected the commercial ambitions of the East India Company with the authority of local Indian rulers.

The importance of the grant became clearer when construction began. In February 1640, Day and Andrew Cogan travelled to Madras with Company officials, soldiers and artisans. They reached Madraspatnam on 20 February 1640, a date traditionally taken as marking the first actual English settlement at the site. The new establishment included the factory and the beginning of the fortified structure that became Fort St George. Cogan became closely involved in strengthening the fort and organizing the settlement, while Day’s earlier work had been central to selecting the site and obtaining the grant (Greater Chennai Corporation). The grant should also be viewed in relation to later grants. The Greater Chennai Corporation’s account notes that the English received confirmation from the Chandragiri ruler and that a later grant in 1645 confirmed earlier rights and extended the Company’s authority. This shows that the Company’s position was developed gradually. The foundation of Madras was therefore not completed in a single document. It involved continuing negotiations and confirmations as the political situation changed.

The arrival of the English in February 1640 marked the beginning of a permanent English settlement. The first group was not large. It included Company factors and writers, European soldiers and artisans, as well as Indian workers. The early settlement was organized around the factory, which later developed into Fort St George. The fort was important because it provided security for the Company’s commercial property and created a clearly defined centre for administration. Andrew Cogan played a major role in the construction and early organization of the settlement. The Greater Chennai Corporation describes Cogan as being mainly responsible for the erection of the fort and for the colonization of the place during the early years. Francis Day and Cogan were both later criticized by the Company for different reasons, but their roles in the foundation of Madras were nevertheless important.

The settlement began to attract Indian residents very quickly. The Greater Chennai Corporation’s historical account records the growth of houses around the fort and the arrival of large numbers of weaver families in Madraspatnam. This development is important because textiles were at the centre of the Company’s economic interest. A successful textile trade required not only merchants but also weavers, dyers, suppliers, transporters and brokers. The growth of the Indian town was therefore closely connected with the commercial requirements of the English factory. The early town was not simply an English enclave. Indian institutions and communities continued to exist around it. The historical account mentions the construction and endowment of the Chenna Kesava Perumal temple in the Indian town. It also mentions Indian figures such as Naga Battan and Beri Timmana, who were connected with the early settlement. These examples show that the English factory became part of a wider urban society rather than remaining isolated from it. The distinction between the fortified European settlement and the surrounding Indian town later became an important feature of Madras. The area around the fort became associated with European administration and military protection, while the Indian town developed its own commercial and social life. The terminology of ‘White Town’ and ‘Black Town’ became more important in later colonial history, but the basic division between the fort and the surrounding Indian settlement began during the early development of Madras. The establishment of Fort St George therefore had two connected effects. First, it gave the East India Company a permanent base for trade and administration. Second, it created a new urban centre that attracted Indian economic activity. The later growth of Madras depended on this combination of a fortified Company centre and a much larger Indian commercial society.

The names Madraspatnam and Chennapatnam are closely associated with the early history of the city. Madraspatnam was the name of the village mentioned in the original grant obtained by Francis Day. As the English settlement developed around the fort, another name, Chennapatnam, became associated with the new town. The exact relationship between these names has been debated because the settlements expanded and gradually joined together. The Greater Chennai Corporation’s historical account explains that the original village of Madraspatnam lay to the north of the fort, while the settlement around the fort was associated with Chennapatnam. Damarla Venkatapathy Nayak and his brother Ayyappa are said to have wanted the new English settlement to be known as Chennapatnam after their father Chennappa Nayak. A later grant associated with Srirangarayalu used another name, Srirangarayapatnam. These variations show that the naming of the settlement was connected with political relationships as well as local usage. The origin of the word Madras itself is uncertain. Several explanations have been proposed. Some traditions connect the name with a local person, while other explanations have suggested Portuguese, religious or linguistic origins. The Greater Chennai Corporation notes several such theories and also points out that the name Madras was already in use before the English settlement. This makes it difficult to accept a single explanation without qualification. For students of history, the important point is that the name has a long and debated history and that different communities used different forms.

The early European population of Madras was relatively small compared with the Indian population of the region. Company officials, soldiers, artisans, merchants and other Europeans were required to operate the factory and defend the settlement. The fort provided a protected centre, but the Europeans depended on the surrounding Indian population for food, labour, construction, transport and trade. Francis Day and Andrew Cogan are the two figures most closely connected with the initial English settlement. Day’s contribution was mainly related to the selection of the site and the negotiation of the land grant. Cogan was closely connected with the construction and early administration of the fort. The Greater Chennai Corporation describes them as founders in the sense that their work laid the foundations of the English settlement, although neither became a lasting public symbol of the city.

Other Europeans came to Madras because the Company needed people with different skills. Factors and writers handled commercial records and correspondence. Soldiers provided military protection. Artisans were involved in construction and maintenance. The Company also employed or contracted people from outside the European community. The presence of an Indian powder-maker, Naga Battan, among the early group is a useful example of this mixed workforce. It shows that even the first English settlement required specialized Indian knowledge and labour. The early settlement also attracted European residents who were not necessarily Company officials. Merchants and other private traders saw opportunities in the growing port town. At the same time, Portuguese residents from nearby São Tomé and Indian merchants from established trading communities could participate in the expanding commercial environment. The result was a town in which different languages, religions and commercial practices existed side by side.

The term ‘dubash’ comes from the idea of a person who knew or used two languages. In the context of colonial South India, however, a dubash was much more than a translator. Dubashes served as intermediaries between European merchants and Indian society. They could work as interpreters, brokers, merchants, agents, suppliers and negotiators. Their importance grew because European Company officials often lacked detailed knowledge of local languages, commercial customs, social relationships and systems of credit. The role of the dubash developed from the practical requirements of trade. An English merchant who wanted to purchase large quantities of cotton cloth had to find reliable producers, agree on prices, arrange payments and ensure that the goods were delivered. A person with knowledge of the local market could perform these tasks more effectively than a newly arrived European official. The intermediary could also communicate with local authorities and help settle disputes. In this way, the dubash became a link between two different commercial worlds.

Susan Neild-Basu’s study of the dubashes of Madras is particularly useful for understanding their importance. She argues that the need for intermediaries was built into the economic and political structure of colonial port towns. This means that dubashes should not be treated as accidental helpers who appeared only because of language problems. Their position was connected with the way European companies conducted business in Asian societies. They became influential because the Company depended on their networks and knowledge (Neild-Basu). Dubashes could perform several functions at the same time. As interpreters, they helped translate conversations and documents. As brokers, they connected European merchants with Indian sellers and producers. As merchants, they could participate in trade on their own account. As agents, they could supervise purchases and manage money or goods. As political intermediaries, they could communicate with local officials and influential families. Because of these different responsibilities, successful dubashes could accumulate considerable wealth and social influence. The relationship between European officials and dubashes was not always equal or peaceful. European officials depended on intermediaries, but they could also suspect them of making private profits or using their position for personal advantage. Dubashes, on the other hand, had their own economic interests and could use their knowledge to negotiate with the Company. This made the relationship one of mutual dependence as well as unequal power.

The role of dubashes also shows why colonial history should include Indian actors. If the history of Madras is written only through the actions of English governors and Company officials, an important part of the city’s development is missed. Indian merchants and intermediaries were active participants in the colonial economy. They did not simply receive decisions made by Europeans; they negotiated, supplied goods, built networks and sometimes accumulated significant wealth.

The early history of Madras contains several Indian figures who were connected with the English settlement. The Greater Chennai Corporation’s historical account mentions Naga Battan, a Hindu powder-maker who accompanied the first English settlers, and Beri Timmana, who was associated with the Company’s commercial activities. It also mentions Raghava Battan, who had connections with the Portuguese settlement at San Thome and later helped the English in their dealings concerning the Madras site. These individuals provide examples of the local knowledge and services on which the English settlement depended. Beri Timmana is especially relevant to the development of the early commercial town. He is described in the municipal historical account as a broker and merchant associated with the Company. Such a position required knowledge of local markets and relationships with producers. The English Company could not directly manage every stage of textile production and exchange. It needed people who could negotiate with weavers, organize supplies and connect the factory with the surrounding economy. The importance of such intermediaries increased as Madras expanded. A small factory could perhaps depend on a few personal relationships, but a growing town required more organized networks.

The dubashes also played a role in the cultural life of the city. Because they operated between European and Indian communities, they could participate in different social worlds. Some became wealthy enough to support religious institutions, buildings and charitable activities. Their wealth was connected to the colonial economy, but their activities also influenced the physical and cultural development of Madras. This is one reason scholars have paid attention to the dubashes when studying the formation of colonial urban society. The study of early Indian intermediaries also changes the way we understand the meaning of European settlement. The English did not create the commercial life of Madras by themselves. They entered an existing economy and reorganized parts of it around the needs of overseas trade. Indian merchants, artisans and intermediaries helped make this reorganization possible. The resulting colonial city was produced through interaction between European institutions and Indian society.

The foundation of Madras created a new relationship between European commercial institutions and Indian society. The English Company brought a fortified trading establishment, but the surrounding population remained overwhelmingly Indian. The Company therefore had to negotiate with local rulers, employ Indian workers and depend on Indian merchants. The early city was shaped by these relationships in everyday activities such as trade, construction, food supply, transport and administration. Political authority was particularly important in the beginning. The English obtained permission to settle from the local Nayak authority and later sought confirmation from the rulers of Chandragiri. The Company’s position became stronger only as its political and military influence expanded. This means that the early Madras settlement should be distinguished from the later period when the English became a major territorial power in South India. Economic interaction was even more continuous. Textile production connected the English factory with Indian villages and towns beyond the fort. Weavers and other producers responded to the demand for cloth, while merchants and brokers organized transactions. The presence of the Company could create opportunities for some groups while also changing patterns of production and trade. Madras therefore became a point where local economic activity was increasingly connected with overseas markets.

Religious and cultural interaction was also visible. The Portuguese settlement at San Thome had Catholic institutions, while the English settlement developed alongside Hindu temples and other Indian religious communities. The presence of different communities contributed to the cultural diversity that later became a characteristic of Chennai. The history of the city cannot therefore be reduced to military or economic history alone; it also includes religious institutions, language, social customs and community life. The relationship between the English settlement and the Indian town was sometimes unequal. Europeans enjoyed particular privileges within the Company settlement, while Indian residents were subject to different forms of authority. As the English acquired greater political power, these inequalities became more pronounced. However, during the earliest stage, the Company remained dependent on Indian cooperation. This combination of dependence and inequality is a central feature of early colonial history. The formation of Madras can therefore be understood as a process of cultural and economic interaction. European institutions were introduced into an already existing Indian environment, and both sides influenced the development of the settlement. The English gained a commercial base, while local merchants, producers and intermediaries found new opportunities and new constraints. The resulting urban society was neither purely European nor simply a continuation of the older Indian settlement. It was a new colonial environment created through interaction.

The advent of Europeans was important because it laid the foundations for the later transformation of Madras into a major colonial capital. The Portuguese presence at San Thome established an earlier European connection, but the English settlement at Fort St George developed into the more powerful political and commercial centre. The land grant of 1639 gave the English a recognized basis for settlement, and the establishment of the factory in 1640 created a permanent institutional presence. The foundation of Madras also changed the geography of the region. A fortified European centre developed beside an Indian town, and the settlement gradually attracted merchants, weavers, artisans and other workers. As the town expanded, neighbouring villages and suburban areas became connected with it. The later acquisition of additional territories and the development of colonial administration can be traced back to the secure base created by Fort St George. The commercial importance of textiles was another major factor. The English Company’s interest in Madras was initially driven by trade rather than by a plan to establish a territorial empire. However, commercial institutions required political protection, and political protection gradually encouraged military and administrative expansion. In this way, the early commercial settlement became the starting point for a much larger colonial system.

The role of Indian intermediaries was equally significant. The dubashes and other merchants made it possible for the Company to operate within local society. They helped the Company obtain goods, communicate with producers and authorities, and manage commercial relationships. Susan Neild-Basu’s research is useful here because it shows that intermediaries were part of the basic structure of colonial port cities rather than an unimportant side feature (Neild-Basu). The history of Madras also demonstrates the importance of local political agency. Damarla Venkatapathy Nayak and Ayyappa Nayak were involved in the negotiations that allowed the English to establish themselves. The English settlement could not have been created in the same form without this political permission. Later developments changed the balance of power, but the initial foundation was based on interaction with Indian authorities. Finally, the advent of Europeans contributed to the creation of a socially diverse urban centre. Portuguese, English and other Europeans lived alongside Indian merchants, artisans, religious communities and labourers. The city developed through this mixture of populations and institutions. The modern cultural diversity of Chennai has many later sources, but the early colonial period established an important historical pattern of interaction among different communities.

The advent of Europeans in the Madras region was a gradual process that involved several communities and stages. The Portuguese settlement at São Tomé formed an earlier European presence near Mylapore. The English East India Company later searched for a new trading centre on the Coromandel Coast because it wanted better access to textiles and a more secure commercial base. Francis Day’s exploration, the negotiations with the Nayak authorities and the land grant of 1639 led to the establishment of the English settlement at Madraspatnam in 1640. The development of Fort St George transformed the settlement into a permanent centre of English trade and administration. However, the English were never the only actors in the making of Madras. Indian rulers provided political permission, merchants organized trade, weavers supplied textiles, artisans contributed skills and intermediaries helped Europeans communicate with local society. The dubashes were especially important because they worked across linguistic, commercial and social boundaries. Therefore, the history of the advent of Europeans should be understood as a history of interaction. European commercial expansion was important, but it operated through Indian political and economic structures. The foundation of Madras was the beginning of a new colonial urban society, not the sudden replacement of the older society. Understanding this process helps explain how Madras developed from a coastal settlement into the major city that later became Chennai.

• Portuguese: established an important settlement at São Tomé near Mylapore before the English foundation of Madras.
• English East India Company: established in 1600 and interested in the textile trade of the Coromandel Coast.
• Francis Day: explored the coast in 1637 and played the leading role in selecting the Madraspatnam site.
• Damarla Venkatapathy Nayak and Ayyappa Nayak: local political authorities associated with the grant and negotiations for the English settlement.
• 1639: land grant that provided the English with a basis for establishing a settlement at Madraspatnam.
• 1640: English settlement established; Fort St George subsequently became the centre of colonial Madras.
• Andrew Cogan: closely associated with the early construction and organization of Fort St George.
• Madraspatnam and Chennapatnam: names connected with the early settlements that gradually developed into one urban centre.
• Early settlers: Company officials, soldiers, artisans and Indian workers formed the initial settlement.
• Dubashes: Indian intermediaries who acted as interpreters, brokers, merchants, agents and negotiators.

• Ahir, Rajiv. A Brief History of Modern India. Spectrum Books, 2020.
• Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar. From Plassey to Partition and After: A History of Modern India. Orient BlackSwan, 2015.
• Chandra, Bipan. India’s Struggle for Independence, 1857–1947. Penguin Books, 1989.
• Love, Henry Davison. Vestiges of Old Madras, 1640–1800. 4 vols., John Murray, 1913.
• Madras Tercentenary Celebration Committee. The Madras Tercentenary Commemoration Volume. Asian Educational Services, 1994.
• Muthiah, S. Madras Rediscovered: A Historical Guide to Looking Around, Supplemented with Tales of “Once Upon a City”. EastWest Books, 1999.
• Neild-Basu, Susan. “The Dubashes of Madras.” Modern Asian Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, 1984, pp. 1–31.
• Winius, George D. “A Tale of Two Coromandel Towns: Madraspatam (Fort St. George) and São Thomé de Meliapur.” Itinerario, vol. 18, no. 1, 1994, pp. 51–64.