Overview
Why do people travel at all? This module looks at the psychology behind the decision to travel — the internal needs that push someone toward a holiday, the classic theories that explain those needs, and how marketers use this understanding to shape destination choice.
Learning objectives
By the end of this module, you’ll be able to:
- 1Identify the types of travel motivation and explain the motivation process
- 2Apply Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Dann’s push-and-pull theory, and Gray’s sunlust/wanderlust theory to travel behaviour
- 3Distinguish non-destination motivators from destination-specific motivators
- 4Explain how marketers use motivation theory, and identify current tourism trends
3.1 Motivation of Travel
Three topics — click to expand each one.
What Is Travel Motivation?
Travel motivation refers to the internal psychological and biological needs and forces that arouse, direct, and integrate a person’s behaviour toward travel. It is the “why” behind a trip — distinct from the destination chosen, which answers “where.”
Types of Motivation
- Physical/physiological motivators — the need for rest, relaxation, health, and physical activity or sport
- Cultural motivators — curiosity about other places, people, customs, and ways of life
- Interpersonal motivators — the desire to visit friends and relatives, escape daily routine, or seek new social interaction
- Status and prestige motivators — travel for business, education, personal development, or to enhance one’s ego and social standing
The Motivation Process
Motivation typically unfolds as a cycle:
- Need arousal — an unmet need creates internal tension (e.g. exhaustion from work)
- Drive — the tension pushes the person to seek a way to resolve it
- Goal-directed behaviour — the person plans and takes a trip aimed at satisfying that need
- Satisfaction — the trip reduces the original tension, at least temporarily
This cycle is shaped by both internal psychological factors and external influences like marketing, social pressure, and available information.
3.2 Motivation Theories
Three theories — click to expand each one.
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy — physiological, safety, belongingness, esteem, and self-actualization needs — maps onto travel behaviour at every level:
| Need level | Travel expression |
|---|---|
| Physiological | Rest and relaxation holidays, sun-and-sand breaks |
| Safety | Preference for secure, low-risk destinations |
| Belongingness | Family reunions, social and group travel |
| Esteem | Status travel, luxury experiences |
| Self-actualization | Spiritual journeys, educational travel, personal growth trips |
Dann’s Push and Pull Theory (1977)
Graham Dann proposed that travel decisions happen in two stages, driven by two different kinds of factors:
- Push factors — internal, socio-psychological motives that predispose a person to want to travel at all: the need to escape, relax, gain prestige, or interact socially. These come first, and answer “why travel?”
- Pull factors — external, destination-specific attributes that attract the traveller once the decision to travel has already been made: attractions, climate, culture, cost, safety. These answer “why there?”
Gray’s Travel Motivation Theory: Sunlust & Wanderlust
Peter Gray (1970) proposed two contrasting travel motivations:
- Sunlust — the desire for a specific superior amenity not available at home, such as better sun, sea, or sand. Because it is about a type of experience rather than a unique place, sunlust can often be satisfied by any comparable substitute destination.
- Wanderlust — the desire to exchange the known for the unknown, to see different places, peoples, and cultures. Unlike sunlust, wanderlust cannot be satisfied by a substitute — only by travelling to genuinely different, specific places.
3.3 Motivators, Marketers & Tourism Trends
Three topics — click to expand each one.
Non-Destination Motivators
These are general push factors not tied to any specific place — the need for escape, rest, prestige, or social interaction. Because they are not destination-specific, they can potentially be satisfied by many different possible destinations.
Destination-Specific Motivators
These are the unique pull attributes of a particular place that make it the specific choice once the traveller has decided to go somewhere — its attractions, culture, safety record, cost, accessibility, and marketed image.
How Marketers Use Motivation & Current Tourism Trends
How marketers use motivation theory
- Segment markets by motivation type (relaxation seekers vs. cultural explorers vs. status travellers)
- Craft destination image and branding to match specific pull factors
- Design promotional campaigns that speak directly to push factors — e.g. “escape the everyday”
Current tourism trends
- Experiential and experience-based travel over conventional sightseeing
- Sustainable and responsible tourism
- Solo travel and digital nomadism
- Wellness tourism
- “Bleisure” travel — combining business trips with leisure time
- Social-media-influenced destination choice
- Personalisation of travel planning through technology
Readings
Discussion
Think about the last trip you took, or one you’re planning. Was it driven more by “sunlust” (a specific amenity, like a beach) or “wanderlust” (the unfamiliar itself)? What push factor got you thinking about travel in the first place, and what pull factor decided where you went? Post your answer, then respond to a classmate.
Practice quiz
Ungraded — check your understanding before the assignment.
1. In Dann’s theory, push factors are best described as:
2. According to Gray’s theory, “wanderlust” is best satisfied by:
3. A family reunion trip mainly satisfies which level of Maslow’s hierarchy?
4. Destination-specific (pull) motivators would include:
5. “Bleisure” travel refers to:
Graded assignment
Motivation analysis — 300–500 words
Interview someone (or reflect on your own experience) about a recent trip. Identify their push and pull factors using Dann’s theory, classify the trip as sunlust or wanderlust using Gray’s theory, and map the underlying need onto Maslow’s hierarchy.
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Correct application of Dann’s push/pull framework | 30% |
| Correct sunlust/wanderlust classification with justification | 25% |
| Accurate mapping to Maslow’s hierarchy | 25% |
| Clarity and structure | 20% |